MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416207060 · doi:10.1177/19160216251392559

Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Pregnant Laryngeal Dystonia Patients: Case Series and Survey of Current Practice of Canadian Laryngologists

2025· article· en· W4416207060 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kaishan Aravinthan, Mélissa Patry, Amanda Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyLaryngomalaciaRetrospective cohort studyBotulinum toxinLaryngologyAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ImportanceOnabotulinumtoxin A (BTX) is the first-line treatment for laryngeal dystonia (LD). The US FDA designated BTX as a pregnancy category C drug because there are no well-controlled studies in pregnant women.ObjectivesTo describe pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in pregnant LD patients treated with BTX injections and to assess the current practice and comfort level of Canadian laryngologists in treating these patients.DesignCase Series and Survey.SettingAcademic, tertiary care, laryngology center.ParticipantsPregnant women who received BTX for LD from 2010 to 2020.InterventionA retrospective chart review was conducted for eligible patients. An anonymous, online, cross-sectional survey was distributed to Canadian laryngologists, according to Dillman's Total Design method.Main outcome measuresPregnancy and neonatal outcomes.ResultsFour adductor LD patients received BTX during each of their 2 pregnancies; 8 pregnancies were examined. Patients received a median of 4.5 treatments (IQR 3) with a median cumulative dose of 5.12 U (IQR 2.93 U) over the whole pregnancy. One pregnancy was pre-term and the median APGAR score was 9 (IQR 0.5). All mothers breastfed their infants. There were no adverse events (AE) and all children were healthy, with a median age of 7 (IQR 2). Twenty-three Canadian laryngologists responded to the survey, for an 85.2% response rate. Three laryngologists (13.0%) have previously injected BTX in a total of 5 pregnant women. All 5 pregnancies went to term with no AE. The majority (68.4%) of respondents indicated that they would offer BTX injections to pregnant LD patients after obtaining informed consent.ConclusionThis case series was the largest in the literature of pregnant LD patients undergoing BTX treatment. The majority of Canadian laryngologists would offer the procedure to pregnant women with informed consent.RelevanceThis study added to the growing literature on the safety of BTX injections in LD patients during pregnancy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgerySame topicBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207