PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY FOR HIP DYSPLASIA WITH AND WITHOUT HIP ARTHROSCOPY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) is often sufficient to treat the symptoms and improve quality of life for symptomatic hip dysplasia. However, acetabular cartilage/labral pathologies are very commonly present and there is a lack of evidence examining the benefits of the adjunct arthroscopy to these. The goal of this study is to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing PAO with and without arthroscopy. A prospective, randomized controlled multi-center trial including 203 patients with symptomatic hip dysplasia was conducted. 99 patients with hip dysplasia were randomized to receive an isolated PAO [mean age 27 years (16-44); Mean BMI of 25.1 (18.3-37.2); 83% females] and 104 patients underwent concomitant PAO with an arthroscopy [mean age 27 years (16-49); Mean BMI of 25.1 (17.5-25.1); 88% females]. Clinical outcomes were assessed pre-operatively, at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post-surgery, using the international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT-33), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome (HOOS), and the (PROMIS) score. Revision and Reoperation were also recorded. There were no significant differences between the patients receiving a PAO plus arthroscopy and the patients receiving PAO alone 6-, 12-, and 24 months, post-surgery. The mean (SD) Pre-operative PROMIS score was [32.3 (SD 7.1) vs. 34.1(SD 5.8)] and 24 months post-operative was [38.7 (SD 6.3) vs. 38.5 (SD 7.0)]. Pre-operative iHot-33 score was [31.2 (SD 16.0) vs. 36.4 (SD 15.9)] and 24 months post-operative was [78.5 (SD 22.7) vs. 77.1 (SD 20.9)]. Pre-operative HOOS score was [49.9 (SD 16.9) vs. 54.2 (SD 16.9)] and 24 months post-operative was [86.8 (SD 14.1) vs. 83.3 (SD 16.0)]. 27 patients from the PAO plus arthroscopy and 28 without had reoperation for events including hardware removal, unresolved pain, and superficial wound infection. 4 patients having PAO without arthroscopy necessitated an arthroscopy later to resolve persistent symptoms and 1 patient from the PAO plus arthroscopy necessitated an additional arthroscopy. The results demonstrated an improvement in outcomes and quality of life for both groups with no significant differences in the postoperative outcomes of patients receiving PAO with and without an arthroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".