MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416207478 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.028

QUANTIFICATION OF RADIATION EXPOSURE IN CANADIAN ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY RESIDENTS

2025· article· en· W4416207478 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gerard Ryan, Sung-Tae Yee, K. Rondeau, Prism Schneider

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthopedic surgeryRadiation exposureLinear regressionInstitutional review boardPopulationCohort studyRegression analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background radiation exposure in the general population averages three milliSieverts (mSv) annually. Despite protective measures, evidence of radiation-related diseases in orthopaedic surgeons is increasing. Similarly, radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents is believed to be elevated, yet this has not been quantified in a Canadian orthopaedic training system. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgery residents and to determine the variability of exposure among post graduate year (PGY) of residency training. In this prospective cohort study, monthly radiation exposure was measured over a 12-month period in orthopaedic surgery residents from a single Canadian training program. Participants wore dosimeters above (“exposed”) and beneath (“shielded”) protective lead. The primary outcome measure was the absolute value of radiation exposure in mSv. Repeated measures analysis was used to determine which variables (age, sex, year of training, operating room (OR) days, height, and use of personalized protective equipment) correlated with radiation exposure. Mean monthly radiation was calculated per individual, continuous variables were assessed using linear regression and categorical variables were assessed using ANOVA and Tukey adjusted pairwise comparisons. Following research ethics board approval, 21 participants (mean age 28.4 (2.5) years, 38.9% female, 3 excluded) provided informed consent to participate in this study. The mean annual occupational radiation exposure was 3.30 ±0.64 mSv over an average of 107 ±38 OR days. Mean exposure per OR day was 0.03 ±0.01 mSv. PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents had the highest cumulative exposure, while PGY-5 residents had the highest mean exposure per OR day (0.04 ±0.01 mSv/day, Figure 1, Table 1). Number of OR days per month and PGY level were significant predictors of radiation exposure (p The annual radiation exposure that orthopaedic residents experience is nearly twice the general population's background exposure. Given that overall radiation exposure was highest during early residency years, radiation safety education and safe clinical practices are essential early in orthopaedic training. Notably, the PGY-5 residents were exposed to the highest average daily dose of radiation, which likely reflects the transition-to-practice phase of residency, during which there may be increased reliance on intra-operative fluoroscopy. Additional radiation safety reminders at this stage of training should also be formalized to promote career-long safe practices. For any figures or tables, please contact the authors directly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207