Effect of simplified exercise program on quality of life, biomarkers, pain and muscle strength of individuals with knee osteoarthritis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a simplified exercise program for patients with knee osteoarthritis in terms of pain, functionality, muscle strength, and quality of life. The correlation of serum levels of molecules and cytokines was evaluated after the exercise program. METHODS: Overall, 47 patients with knee osteoarthritis participated in this single-arm interventional study. Outcomes were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Quality of Life, Visual Analog Scale, Timed Up and Go functional test, and muscle strength assessment. Serum levels of molecules and cytokines were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: The program resulted in improvements in pain and physical function (0.21 points; 95%CI=-0.26; -0.17), Visual Analog Scale (1.50; 95%CI=-1.90; -1.10), EuroQol-5 Dimension 3-Level (0.16; 95%CI=0.100; 0.227), and Timed Up and Go test (0.40; 95%CI=-0.57; -0.23). Significant differences were noted in the isokinetic knee flexion peak torque (0.16; 95%CI=0.10; 0.22), isometric knee extension (0.31; 95%CI=0.20; 0.43), and flexion (0.18; 95%CI=0.12; 0.23) peak torques for osteoarthritis. However, there was no significant difference in serum biomarker levels after the program, and there was no correlation between serum biomarker levels and clinical improvement outcomes. CONCLUSION: The simplified exercise program for patients with knee osteoarthritis patients effectively improved pain, functionality, muscle strength, and quality of life. However, biomarkers do not provide evidence of clinical improvement. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02964624.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it