FedEHD: Entropic High-Order Descent for Robust Federated Multi-Source Environmental Monitoring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose Federated Entropic High-Order Descent (FedEHD), a drop-in client optimizer that augments local SGD with (i) an entropy (sign) term and (ii) quadratic and cubic gradient components for drift control and implicit clipping. Across non-IID CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 benchmarks (100 clients, 10% sampled per round), FedEHD achieves faster and higher convergence than strong baselines including FedAvg, FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedDyn, MOON, and FedAdam. On CIFAR-10, it reaches 70% accuracy in approximately 80 rounds (versus 100 for MOON and 130 for SCAFFOLD) and attains a final accuracy of 72.5%. On CIFAR-100, FedEHD surpasses 60% accuracy by about 150 rounds (compared with 250 for MOON and 300 for SCAFFOLD) and achieves a final accuracy of 68.0%. In an environmental monitoring case study involving four distributed air-quality stations, FedEHD yields the highest macro AUC/F1 and improved calibration (ECE 0.183 versus 0.186–0.210 for competing federated methods) without additional communication and with only O(d) local overhead. The method further provides scale-invariant coefficients with optional automatic adaptation, theoretical guarantees for surrogate descent and drift reduction, and convergence curves that illustrate smooth and stable learning dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it