MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416221510 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.13.109

REDUCING OEDEMA, HOSPITAL STAYS, AND READMISSION IN THE ORTHOPAEDIC POPULATION

2025· article· en· W4416221510 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dorace Ramage, Colin F. Burrows

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnkleEdemaPopulationEmergency departmentOrthopedic surgeryComplicationArthroplasty

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over 25,000 hip and knee replacements (THR TKR) are performed in Ontario each year, and the impact of an emergency department (ED) presentation rate of 15% or 1 in 7 patients within 30 days of surgery is considerable.1 In a US analysis, 2344 THR and 5520 TKR surgeries between 2012 and 2015 were reviewed. The common reasons for 90 day ED visits were pain (15.8%) and swelling (15.6%).2 Patients with ankle fractures requiring surgical intervention present with edema and pain requiring time and traditional edema management prior to surgery. The impact of a neuromuscular stimulation device (NMES) on peripheral edema in the orthopaedic population will be examined. A literature review was conducted using Cochrane Review, PubMed, Google Scholar, and cross-references using search words edema, electric nerve stimulation, arthroplasty, ankle/knee surgery and bloodflow. Seven papers were reviewed, 5 reported the impact of NMES on bloodflow, edema and hospitalization. One study compared bloodflow in the peroneal, posterior tibial and gastrocnemial veins with and without NMES in healthy volunteers. Peak velocity, ejected volume/stimulus, and volume flows during muscle contraction demonstrated statistically a significant increase using NMES.3 Twenty patients requiring ankle fracture fixation reported 60% of participants were surgery ready after 2 NMES treatment days vs. 27% in the control group (P < 0 .01).4 Nine patients with ankle sprains and swelling demonstrated improvement with NMES.5 Forty participants following hip replacement demonstrated decreased leg volume, compared to the compression stockings group.6 In 118 post renal transplant patients a significant decrease in calf and thigh circumference was noted in the NMES group vs standard of care (P < .002)7 Edema impacts the healing trajectory of arthroplasty or ankle sprain patients. Edema, following ankle fracture can delay time to surgery. ED visits post TKR or THR surgery due to edema and pain are substantial. Although traditional treatment modalities remain in place, NMES has demonstrated a superior effect in reducing or preventing edema in the orthopaedic population. Further studies are needed to define the benefits in each indication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesFrench-language works237,207