MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416222720 · doi:10.3389/fvets.2025.1689681

Exploring the gut–kidney axis: possible connection between gastrointestinal and renal disorders in dromedary camels

2025· article· en· W4416222720 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed Tharwat, Hazem M M Elmoghazy, Abdelmonem Abdallah

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Veterinary Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Diversity and Health Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Prince Edward Island
FundersQassim University
KeywordsRelevance (law)Connection (principal bundle)KidneyClinical significanceGastrointestinal systemRenal injury

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders and renal dysfunction are common and clinically significant conditions in dromedary camels ( Camelus dromedarius ). However, their interrelationship—representing the gut–renal axis—remains poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the association between GI disorders and renal function in camels using biochemical, ultrasonographic, and causal modeling approaches. Methods Seventy camels were examined, including 49 with GI disorders and 21 clinically healthy controls. Affected camels were categorized as Group 1 (intestinal obstruction, n = 22), Group 2 (GI impaction, n = 20), and Group 3 (chronic diarrhea, n = 7). Clinical evaluation, ultrasonography of the GI and urinary tracts, and biochemical analyses of serum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine were performed. Simple linear regression was used to model associations between GI disorders and renal biomarkers. Directed acyclic graphs were applied to identify potential mediators—hematocrit, total protein, sodium, potassium, albumin, globulin, and phosphorus—and estimate total and direct effects. Results Compared with controls, camels in Groups 1–3 had significantly elevated BUN (2.2-, 1.9-, and 2.6-fold) and creatinine (2.4-, 2.7-, and 3.0-fold) concentrations. Adjustment for mediators produced minimal change, suggesting robust and independent associations between GI disorders and renal impairment. Ultrasonographic findings supported these results: intestinal obstruction showed distended loops with reduced motility; impaction exhibited hyperechogenic rumen contents; and chronic diarrhea was associated with mucosal thickening, increased peristalsis, and mesenteric lymphadenopathy. Discussion Gastrointestinal disorders in dromedary camels are strongly linked to renal dysfunction, as evidenced by consistent biochemical and ultrasonographic abnormalities. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of the gut–renal axis in camels and emphasize the importance of early recognition and management of GI disorders to prevent secondary renal complications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Veterinary ScienceSame topicAnimal Diversity and Health StudiesFrench-language works237,207