MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416225917 · doi:10.1186/s12880-025-02014-3

Predicting mild cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease by integrating striatal MRI radiomics with clinical features

2025· article· en· W4416225917 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haisong Chen, Asta Debora, Hongyan Wang, Xu Jian, Xuemiao Zhao, Jingru Wang, Yunjun Yang, Mengying Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Medical Imaging · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiomicsGeneralizability theoryDiseaseCognitive impairmentPredictive valueMagnetic resonance imagingNeuroimagingCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a common and impactful non-motor complication in Parkinson's disease (PD) that often precedes dementia, underscores the urgent need for early predictive tools applicable to routine clinical practice. This study aims to address this issue by investigating whether integrating striatal radiomics features from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with clinical data can predict MCI in PD patients. METHODS: Baseline T1-weighted MRI images and clinical data of 254 PD patients from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database were retrospectively analyzed. Cognitive function was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), with PD patients classified as PD-MCI or cognitively normal (PD-CN). A total of 1,316 radiomics features were extracted from the bilateral caudate nucleus (CN) and putamen (PU). After dimension reduction and feature selection, a radiomics model was constructed. Independent clinical risk factors were identified via univariate and multivariate logistic regression, and further integrated with radiomics features to develop a clinical-radiomics combined model for PD-MCI prediction. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, confusion matrix, F1 score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Correlations between key radiomics features and MoCA scores were also evaluated. RESULTS: Age and years of education (YOE) were identified as independent clinical risk factors for PD-MCI. The clinical-radiomics combined model outperformed the radiomics-only model in both the training and test sets, with the model incorporating the right PU (PUR) radiomics features achieving the highest AUC: 0.852 (95% CI: 0.787-0.918) in the training set and 0.790 (95% CI: 0.657-0.923) in the test set. The corresponding F1 scores were 0.704 and 0.667, respectively. Additionally, specific radiomics features showed weak but significant correlations with MoCA scores (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Integration of striatal radiomics features derived from structural MRI images with routine clinical factors demonstrates promising predictive performance for PD-MCI. The proposed clinical-radiomics combined model leverages clinically accessible resources, and its predictive value for PD-MCI establishes a preliminary foundation for subsequent related explorations. However, the model's generalizability remains unconfirmed, further validation on independent datasets is required before any consideration of its clinical application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Medical ImagingSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207