High energy resolution fluorescence detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy (HERFD-XAS) for studies of metals and metalloids in biology: current innovations and future perspectives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) is a technique which is frequently used in metallomics research, providing a valuable tool for the elucidation of element-specific electronic and geometric structural information. Recent decades have seen the development of related synchrotron-based X-ray techniques with enhanced analytical capabilities, including X-ray emission spectroscopy (XES), resonant inelastic X-ray scattering (RIXS), and high energy resolution fluorescence detected X-ray absorption spectroscopy (HERFD-XAS). With appropriate experimental configuration, HERFD-XAS can generate spectra with significantly improved spectroscopic resolution and background rejection compared to conventional XAS, providing a substantial advantage in the analysis of dilute analytes in biological samples. These improvements arise from the capability to interrogate selected fluorescence lines with the use of multiple crystal analyzers, minimizing the effects of core-hole lifetime broadening. Herein, we review a range of existing and emerging applications of HERFD-XAS for the study of metals and metalloids in biology and medicine. Direct comparisons of conventional XAS and HERFD-XAS spectra highlight the substantial improvements in resolution, and greater potential for the interpretation of metal speciation in complex and dilute biological samples. We also discuss current challenges with the design of HERFD-XAS experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it