MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416229215 · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103173

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices for Obstetrical Infection Prevention in Alberta: A Multi-Method Study

2025· article· en· W4416229215 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Nicole Naadu Ofosu, Jordan Tate, Charlotte McCartan, Charlene Feuffel, Louise Collier, Nonsikelelo Mathe, Marcia Bruce, Denise Campbell‐Scherer, Eliana Castillo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Canadian institutionsAlberta Health ServicesUniversity of CalgaryAlberta HealthUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Immunization Research NetworkGovernment of AlbertaPfizer
KeywordsPenicillinPenicillin allergyAntimicrobialAntibioticsAntibiotic prophylaxisNeonatal infectionQuality management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Suboptimal antimicrobial prophylaxis in labour and delivery increases the risk of poor health outcomes. We examined Alberta's obstetrical antimicrobial prophylaxis practices to identify gaps and opportunities for clinical improvement. METHODS: We used human-centred design (mapping out patients' journey to delivery) and health care administrative data to establish a baseline of current antimicrobial prophylaxis practices for early-onset neonatal group B Streptococcus (GBS) disease and surgical site infection (SSI) prevention during labour and delivery. RESULTS: Seven obstetrical health care providers participated in the journey mapping process, which highlighted the need for improved allergy documentation. Specifically, the findings emphasized better penicillin allergy risk stratification, accurate electronic record-keeping, and identification of opportunities to de-label patients incorrectly identified as allergic. The analysis of 13 818 patients who delivered in Alberta hospital sites between November 1, 2022 and May 31, 2023 showed that most received appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis for GBS and SSI prevention. Among the 140 GBS-positive patients with beta-lactam allergy who delivered vaginally, cefazolin (62%) was the most prescribed antibiotic, followed by clindamycin (26%) and penicillin (13%). Of the 58 patients with beta-lactam allergy needing SSI prophylaxis, most also received cefazolin. However, some cases still showed suboptimal use of second-line antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The journey map highlights the prenatal period and hospital admission as key phases for ensuring allergy documentation accuracy. Considering that inappropriate penicillin allergy labelling and administration of suboptimal antimicrobial prophylaxis persist, there is room for quality improvement initiatives to promote validation of allergy status and address the use of suboptimal antibiotics for penicillin allergy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology CanadaSame topicDrug-Induced Adverse ReactionsFrench-language works237,207