MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Inborn Errors of Amino Acid Metabolism Revisited: Clinical Implications and Insights into Current Therapies

2025· preprint· W4416231883 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Abdul L. Shakerdi, Darragh Nerney, Eleanor J. Molloy, Ina Knerr

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChildren's Health Foundation
KeywordsNarrative reviewAmino acidAmino acid metabolismLimitingMetaboliteResidual riskClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inborn errors of amino acid metabolism (IEAAMs) are a heterogeneous group of genetic disorders caused by defects in enzymes, cofactors, or transporters of amino acid catabolism, biosynthesis, or transport. These defects result in toxic metabolite accumulation and/or deficiency of essential metabolites. This review aims to provide an updated overview of diagnosis, clinical implications, management, and evolving therapeutic approaches across major IEAAMs. A narrative review of recent literature was undertaken, focusing on established and novel therapeutic strategies for key IEAAMs, including phenylketonuria, alkaptonuria, tyrosinemia, homocystinuria, and maple syrup urine disease. Key management strategies include amino acid-restricted diets/restriction of natural protein with restriction of dietary precursors, dietary supplementations, including disease-specific amino acid supplements, medications to reduce formation of offending metabolites, pharmacotherapies, enzyme/cofactor replacement or pharmacological chaperones, enhancing residual enzyme activity and promoting alternative path-ways/accessory pathways. Emergency therapy is essential in severe types and focuses on promoting anabolism, limiting catabolism, reducing formation, and enhancing clearance of toxic metabolites. Other treatment options include organ transplantation, and new emerging modalities, such as mRNA therapies and gene therapies/in vivo gene editing offer potential for definitive interventions. Despite advancements in therapy and close monitoring, many IEAAMs remain associated with significant comorbidities. Future research is essential to optimise current treatment standards, particularly neuroprotective and metabolic regulatory features. While an in-depth discussion of innovative person-alised therapies is beyond the scope of this article, we believe that collective experiences will thrust future research in this field and expand access to innovative personalised therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.org→Same topicMetabolism and Genetic Disorders→French-language works237,207→