At the Origins of International Cooperation Among Geocryologists: From the History of the Formation of Connections Between Soviet Permafrost Researchers and North American Scientists in the 1960s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study is dedicated to creating a cohesive scientific representation of the initial stage of the development of contacts between scientists from the USSR, the USA, and Canada in the field of permafrost research and the exchange of scientific and practical experience in the development of territories located in the cryolithozone. In this regard, the purpose of the work is to reconstruct the history of the establishment of scientific ties between Soviet geocryologists and their colleagues from North American research centers in the 1960s, as well as to determine the main forms of development and results of this process. The relevance of this issue is emphasized, first, by the existing gap in historiography, and second, by the current geopolitical situation. It appears that the reconstruction of examples from the past, demonstrating the possibilities and role of scientific connections in establishing contacts between countries at odds in military-political and financial-economic relations, could serve as one of the drivers for the gradual "reset" of international relations in the modern world. The development of the topic is based on documents identified in the archives of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Scientific Archive of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. In processing these documents, mainly historical methods of scientific knowledge were employed: the principle of historicism, historical-typological, historical-comparative, and historical-genetic methods. As a result of the conducted research, a coherent scientific representation of the history of the establishment of international ties among Soviet, American, and Canadian permafrost researchers in the 1960s has been created for the first time in historiography. In this context, the history of joint initiatives realized during this period has been reconstructed. It is noted that despite the limited nature of cooperation, the first experience of interaction demonstrated in this article was a significant step forward and subsequently led to a considerable intensification of international ties among permafrost researchers. During the examined period, this experience was represented by participation in international forums held in the USA and the USSR, as well as by reciprocal familiarization trips of geocryologists, which effectively took the form of internships, facilitating the exchange of scientific and practical experience regarding the consideration of the permafrost factor in the development of Arctic and Subarctic territories. The role of the director of the Institute of Permafrost Studies, P.I. Melnikov, in developing international scientific ties is also highlighted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.022 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".