The Construction History of the Yuzhno-Donuzlav Settlement during the Late Scythian Period (Based on Reports by O. D. Dashevskaya)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article presents plans of the Late Scythian Yuzhno-Donuzlav settlement (Northwestern Crimea) for the first time. Using materials from the 1960s–1970s, we can trace the evolution of the settlement’s layout from the last quarter of the 2nd century BC to the early 2nd century AD and compare it with other settlements in the region. The earliest Late Scythian structures at the Yuzhno-Donuzlav settlement likely consisted of annexes added to Greek buildings, all of which were protected by a fence. Between 110 BC and 60 BC, new multi-chamber houses were built, along with a rampart and ditch. From 60 BC to 20 AD, the settlement expanded beyond these defensive structures, with one of the new areas enclosed by its own fence. The main layout consisted of multi-chamber houses with similar orientations. After 20 AD, the area of the settlement decreased, and it began to consist of single-chamber dwellings. Overall, the Yuzhno-Donuzlav settlement resembles contemporary settlements in Northwestern Crimea but exhibits several notable differences. For example, the earliest Late Scythian defensive wall in the region was likely found here. Subsequently, the “suburb” of the settlement was surrounded by its own defensive fence, which is unusual for neighboring sites. There are other differences too, but these can likely be attributed to poor preservation, specific recording methods, and challenges in interpretation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.091 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".