MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Analytical Investigation of Urban Expansion Patterns in the Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) Region Using Geoinformatics

2025· article· en· W4416277787 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ratnadeep Ray, Abhinandan Das, Sameer Algburi, Mohd Sayeed Ul Hasan, Ahmed M. Abdulhadi, Ali Majdi

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Environment and Pollution Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeoinformaticsMetropolitan areaUrbanizationUrban expansionUrban planningUrban sprawlCommon spatial patternLand use

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban expansion has been significant and rapid over the last 30 years, with the outward growth of the Kolkata Metropolitan Area (KMA). Much of this growth has followed a lowdensity, disparate development pattern, commonly known as urban sprawl. This study aims to examine the spatial expansion pattern in the Kolkata Metropolitan Development Area (KMDA) between 1990 and 2020 through the application of advanced geoinformatics tools and spatial metrics. We analyzed Landsat Satellite images from 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 to evaluate urban areas, including their extent and trends. Patterns of directional expansion, assessed using standard deviation ellipses and wedge analysis, showed a clear north-to-south axis of growth in the study area. The expansion of urbanization by 2020 was therefore more concentrated in the south-western region. Urban growth rates were measured using the Annual Urban Expansion Rate (AUER), Urban Expansion Intensity Index (UEII), and Landscape Expansion Index (LEI). The urban land cover of the study area increased by 446.71 km2 during the study period. The highest growth rate was from 1990 to 2000 (5.42%), followed by a decline in subsequent decades. LEI analysis revealed edge expansion as the prevalent growth type, which is a typical feature of urban sprawl. A mixture of infilling and peripheral growth patterns points to the processes of urban diffusion and clustering. Results for the Department of Labrador were obtained using the Area-Weighted Mean Patch Fractal Dimension (AWMPFD), which classified the urban spatial patterns into four types: major core, secondary core, suburban fringe, and dispersed settlements. Central aggregation and peripheral fragmentation are related straightforwardly. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) further confirmed this spatial distribution pattern, which has valuable implications for both resource managers and urban planners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.225

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Environment and Pollution TechnologySame topicLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesFrench-language works237,207