The Servant Leader as a Catalyst: An Empirical Investigation of Servant Leadership in Agile Project Management
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Agile project management has become a dominant paradigm for managing complex projects, emphasizing flexibility, customer collaboration, and self-organizing teams. However, traditional, hierarchical leadership models often conflict with Agile’s core values, creating a significant leadership gap. Servant leadership, a philosophy where the leader’s primary goal is to serve the team, is theorized to be a natural fit. This study empirically investigates the impact of servant leadership on key project outcomes within Agile environments. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was administered to 68 project management professionals, selected via purposive sampling, who were actively working in Agile teams. Data was analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results provide robust support for all hypotheses, indicating that servant leadership has a significant positive effect on team performance (β = 0.45, p < 0.001), team member satisfaction (β = 0.52, p < 0.001), and project success (β = 0.38, p < 0.001). These findings underscore that adopting servant leadership is a strategic lever for enhancing team dynamics and achieving superior project outcomes in Agile settings. The study offers practical implications for organizations and lays the groundwork for future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".