MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416290256 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-23935-7

Field trials of the novel varroacide, 1-allyloxy-4-propoxybenzene, against Varroa destructor in Western Canada

2025· article· en· W4416290256 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Robert X. Lu, Abdullah Ibrahim, Olav Rueppell, Erika Plettner, Stephen F. Pernal

Bibliographic record

VenueScientific Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of AlbertaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersSimon Fraser UniversityAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaProject Apis m.Canadian Bee Research Fund
KeywordsVarroa destructorVarroaVarroa sensitive hygieneMiteHoney beeDestructorPesticideHoney Bees

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Varroa destructor is an ectoparasite of western honey bees (Apis mellifera), substantially damaging managed colonies worldwide. Various chemical "varroacides" have been developed to help beekeepers combat infestations of these mites. Nevertheless, treatments may induce non-target toxicity in bees and humans, and their application can be laborious and hazardous. Moreover, widespread varroacide usage has seen the emergence of resistant mite populations, necessitating the need for new treatment options. The dialkoxybenzene, 1-allyloxy-4-propoxybenzene (codenamed 3c{3,6}), has previously been shown to induce paralysis and death of varroa in laboratory experiments, and capable of reducing varroa infestations in full-sized bee colonies. Our study sought to comprehensively investigate 3c{3,6} as a varroacide by optimizing dosages, treatment schedules and application methods across two sets of parallel experiments in Western Canada. Colonies treated with 3c{3,6} were compared to untreated negative controls and positive control colonies treated with the thymol-based commercial product, Thymovar. Across all experiments, 3c{3,6} had mite-killing efficacy comparable to Thymovar, being consistently greater than the untreated colonies, though efficacy varied between years. Treatment with 3c{3,6} did not impact food stores or bee populations. As treatment efficacy varied with dosage and application method, additional studies will be required to optimize 3c{3,6} treatment regimens for potential commercial use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScientific ReportsSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207