Multiclass machine learning models for molecular subtype identification of pediatric low-grade glioma using bi-institutional MRIs for precision medicine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma (pLGG) is the most common pediatric brain tumor, and radiomics-based machine learning (ML) models have shown promise in identifying BRAF fusion and BRAF p.V600E mutation. This bicentric retrospective study included 495 children diagnosed between 1999 and 2023. The local hospital dataset comprised Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans of patients with BRAF fusion (n = 190), BRAF p.V600E mutation (n = 95), FGFR1 (n = 25), and other molecular subtypes (n = 144), while an external dataset included BRAF fusion (n = 32) and BRAF p.V600E mutation (n = 9) cases. Radiomics features were extracted from Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery images, and Random Forest classifiers were trained using Monte Carlo data splits and leave-one-out validation. The best-performing model achieved an average one-vs-the-rest area under receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819 (95% confidence interval [0.791, 0.848]). This study highlights the potential of radiomics-based ML models for molecular subtype differentiation in pLGG, with per-patient predictions enabling outlier identification and subgroup performance evaluation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it