Stroke Mechanism and Severity After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: In the Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Study III (LAAOS III), surgical occlusion of the LAA during cardiac surgery for patients with known history of atrial fibrillation (AF) substantially reduced the risk of stroke. Objective: To assess the impact of LAAO on ischemic stroke subtype and outcome. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a post hoc exploratory analysis of the LAAOS III randomized clinical trial. Data were adjudicated from June 28, 2023, to November 29, 2023, and the main analyses took place from December 18, 2023, to April 29, 2024. The LAAOS III trial recruited participants from 105 centers in 27 countries between July 2012 and October 2018. Patients with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score of at least 2 undergoing cardiac surgery for other indications were included in the analysis. Interventions: Surgical LAAO plus standard care vs standard care alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: For strokes occurring during the trial, the functional outcome as measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at day 7 or discharge, mortality, the presence of cortical infarcts, and the occurrence of infarcts of presumed cardioembolic origin were examined. Results: Of 4811 participants in the LAAOS III trial followed up for 3.8 years, 273 had a first ischemic stroke. The mean (SD) age of participants at the time of the first ischemic stroke was 75 (7) years, 104 were female (38%), and 169 were male (62%). Participants allocated to receive LAAO had reduced (common odds ratio [OR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99) mRS scores at 7 days or discharge and a lower risk for mortality at 30 days (16.5% vs 20.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31-0.97) after a stroke event. Participants allocated to LAAO had fewer cortical infarcts on neuroimaging (46.2% vs 61.3%; difference in proportions: -15.2%; 95% CI, -26.7% to -3.7%), as well as a lower proportion of ischemic strokes of presumed cardioembolic etiology when compared with ischemic strokes in the no-LAAO group (42.9% vs 57.9%; difference in proportions: -15.1%; 95% CI, -26.5% to -3.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that LAAO in patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery was associated with a decreased risk of presumed cardioembolic stroke, reduced disability, and mortality from stroke. These findings underscore the benefit of LAAO for patients with AF undergoing cardiac surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01561651.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".