MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416300078 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.13.688287

Conjugation-mediated DNA delivery to the filamentous fungus <i>Ustilago maydis</i>

2025· preprint· W4416300078 on OpenAlexafffund
Tahani Jaafar, Vida Nasrollahi, Bogumil J. Karas

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsExtrachromosomal DNAHorizontal gene transferDNAPlasmidGeneElectroporationFilamentous fungusGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Phytopathogenic fungi are ubiquitous throughout the environment and threaten global food security. This issue is further amplified by the increasing resistance of pathogens to antimicrobials. Current chemical-based antifungals target cells by inhibiting growth or metabolic function, making them ideal for fungal gain of resistance mutations. Biofungicides are a rising class of antifungals that have low potential for negative environmental impact and provide the fungi almost no potential for gaining resistance. Conjugative plasmids which play a role in the natural mechanism of horizontal gene transfer in bacteria, have been repurposed to deliver toxic genetic cargo to recipient cells, showing promise as next-generation antimicrobial agents. In this work, we have demonstrated the first protocol for delivering DNA from Escherichia coli to the filamentous phytopathogen, Ustilago maydis through conjugation. DNA delivery was confirmed using PCR screening of DNA isolated from the re-streaked transconjugants. Although challenges such as reduced conjugation efficiency and extrachromosomal replication persist, this work establishes the first step towards creating a conjugation-based biofungicide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207