MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416300097 · doi:10.1101/2025.11.11.687921

4D force patterning enables spatial control of angiogenesis

2025· preprint· W4416300097 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sina Kheiri, Jessica Shah, Roger D. Kamm, Ritu Raman

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersArmy Research OfficeKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of DefenseNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMechanotransductionAngiogenesisExtracellular matrixMorphogenesisTissue engineeringSprouting angiogenesisMechanobiologyMatrix (chemical analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Engineering organized microvascular networks remains a critical challenge in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. While biochemical approaches for patterning angiogenesis via growth factor delivery have shown promise, their inability to pattern sustained growth factors with spatiotemporal control limits effectiveness. Here, we demonstrate that dynamically patterned mechanical forces enable precise spatiotemporal control over angiogenic sprouting. We developed a magnetically actuated human vessel-on-a-chip platform that integrates a perfusable endothelialized microchannel within a collagen matrix and allows non-invasive and tunable mechanical stimulation across three spatial dimensions and time (4D). Using an automated 3-axis actuator, we systematically investigated how strain magnitude, frequency, and direction modulate endothelial cell behavior and vessel morphogenesis. Dynamic mechanical stimulation at physiological strain magnitudes (5–15%) enhanced endothelial alignment and barrier function while promoting angiogenesis in a strain-magnitude–dependent manner: lower dynamic strain (5%) maximized sprout initiation, whereas higher dynamic strain (15%) promoted elongation of sprouts. Sequential reorientation of strain direction reprogrammed sprouting trajectories along X, Y, and Z directions, generating complex sprout geometries such as L-shaped branches. RNA sequencing revealed mechanically induced transcriptional profiles distinct from unstimulated controls, characterized by upregulation of genes associated with angiogenesis, mechanotransduction, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Functional perturbation of Piezo1 reduced strain-induced sprouting without altering barrier stabilization, indicating that dynamic mechanical stimulation engages multiple mechanotransduction pathways to regulate angiogenesis. Collectively, these findings establish a strategy for spatiotemporally controlled angiogenesis through 4D force patterning to program vascular morphogenesis while preserving function. This approach provides a foundation for engineering hierarchically organized vascular networks for tissue regeneration. Significance Generation of spatially organized, perfusable microvascular networks is essential for building functional human tissues. Biochemical approaches to pattern angiogenesis rely on diffusive growth factors, which limit control over spatiotemporal sprouting dynamics. Here, we demonstrate that dynamically patterned mechanical forces direct vascular morphogenesis across three spatial dimensions and time (4D). Using a magnetically actuated human vessel-on-a-chip, we show how strain magnitude and orientation govern angiogenic sprouting and reveal transcriptional programs linking mechanical cues to observed functional changes. For the first time, we show that dynamic reorientation of imposed forces can reprogram angiogenic trajectories in real-time. This platform enables programmable mechanical control of angiogenesis and systematic dissection of mechanotransduction pathways, advancing strategies for tissue vascularization, and modeling mechanically regulated vascular diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topic3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207