MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416302516 · doi:10.3389/fphys.2025.1668129

An EEG-based machine learning framework for diagnosing acute sleep deprivation

2025· article· en· W4416302516 on OpenAlexaff
Daya Kumar, Apurva Narayan, Saptharishi Lalgudi Ganesan

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Physiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsChildren’s Health Research InstituteLondon Health Sciences CentreInternational Institute for Sustainable DevelopmentWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep deprivationSleep (system call)ElectroencephalographyDeep learningSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Study objective: Acute sleep deprivation significantly impacts cognitive function, contributes to accidents, and increases the risk of chronic illnesses, underscoring the need for reliable and objective diagnosis. Our work aims to develop a machine learning-based approach to discriminate between EEG recordings from acutely sleep-deprived individuals and those that are well-rested, facilitating the objective detection of acute sleep deprivation and enabling timely intervention to mitigate its adverse effects. Methods: Sixty-one-channel eyes-open resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) data from a publicly available dataset of 71 participants were analyzed. Following preprocessing, EEG recordings were segmented into contiguous, non-overlapping 20-second epochs. For each epoch, a comprehensive set of features was extracted, including statistical descriptors, spectral measures, functional connectivity indices, and graph-theoretic metrics. Four machine learning classifiers - Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LightGBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Classifier (SVC) - were trained on these features using nested stratified cross-validation to ensure unbiased performance evaluation. In parallel, three deep learning models-a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory network (LSTM), and Transformer-were trained directly on the raw multi-channel EEG time-series data. All models were evaluated under two conditions: (i) without subject-level separation, allowing the same participant to contribute to both training and test sets, and (ii) with subject-level separation, where models were tested exclusively on unseen participants. Model performance was assessed using accuracy, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Results: Without subject-level separation, CNN achieved the highest accuracy (95.72%), followed by XGBoost (95.42%), LightGBM (94.83%), RF (94.53%), and SVC (85.25%), with the Transformer (77.39%) and LSTM (66.75%) models achieving lower accuracies. Under subject-level separation, RF achieved the highest accuracy (68.23%), followed by XGBoost (66.36%), LightGBM (66.21%), CNN (65.35%), and SVC (65.08%), while the Transformer (63.35%) and LSTM (61.70%) models achieved the lowest accuracies. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the potential of EEG-based machine learning for detecting acute sleep deprivation, while underscoring the challenges of achieving robust subject-level generalization. Despite reduced accuracy under cross-subject evaluation, these findings support the feasibility of developing scalable, non-invasive tools for sleep deprivation detection using EEG and advanced ML techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.712
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in PhysiologySame topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207