A Machine Learning Model to Evaluate Digital Financial Services Adoption and Sustainable Women Empowerment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Financial services enabled by digital technology can help address the challenges faced by women by overcoming the barriers of proximity and cost. Despite notable advancements in digital financial inclusion in India, women still face obstacles in accessing and utilizing digital financial services. Design/methodology/approach: A machine learning-based self-efficacy-value adoption model (SVAM) is applied to study the influence of self-efficacy and perceived value on the intention to adopt digital financial services (DFS). Likewise, a machine learning-based threshold decision theory was applied to examine the relationship between digital financial services access and the dimension of sustainable women empowerment in rural India. Findings: The results suggest that enhancing user experience and highlighting the benefits of DFS can increase adoption rates among women, thus promoting their economic and social empowerment. Originality/value: In this study, the authors examine an integrated framework based on supervised machine learning to access digital financial services for rural women. They are among the first to apply a self-efficacy-based value adoption model through machine learning to explore this topic. The adoption of digital financial services significantly enhances women's economic, social, and psychological empowerment in rural areas. This evidence-based study will inform policy discussions on developing a gender-sensitive strategy to promote the adoption of digital financial services among women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it