MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416311930 · doi:10.1093/jeb/voaf137

Hidden genetic diversity among <i>Blochmanniella</i> endosymbionts of closely related carpenter ant populations

2025· article· en· W4416311930 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Reo H Maynard, Yumary M. Vasquez, Gordon M. Bennett

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Evolutionary Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHoward Hughes Medical InstituteNational Park ServiceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLineage (genetic)PopulationGenomeSyntenyObligateGenetic diversityPhylogeneticsPhylogenetic tree

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carpenter ants (Family Formicidae; Genus Camponotus) are a globally distributed, arboreal clade. They harbor an intracellular obligate bacterial endosymbiont known as "Candidatus Blochmanniella spp." (hereafter Blochmanniella). The host ant species, C. vicinus, is geographically dispersed across the western United States of America and western Canada. To investigate how Blochmanniella have differentially evolved from related host-endosymbiont lineages, we sampled a C. vicinus population from California's Sierra Nevada mountains, California, U.S.A., at an elevation of 2,300 m. Using morphological characters and Cytochrome Oxidase I markers, we determined that this population is genetically distinct from geographically distributed lineages of C. vicinus from Central California and Western North America (Arizona, U.S.A. to British Columbia, Canada). Thus, we sequenced the genome of the Blochmanniella endosymbiont from this host to understand how closely related symbiont lineages evolve. While our newly sequenced lineage is syntenic with other Blochmanniella, it has lost genes involved in membrane maintenance, bacterial cell information, and nutrition synthesis. Protein-coding genes across its genome are highly divergent as well (average sequence similarity = 93.6%). Therefore, we refer to our novel lineage as the B. vicinus Sequoia lineage (BSEQ). BSEQ can provide 7 of the 10 essential amino acids required by its insect host. It can also help break down toxic urea and repair UV radiation-induced DNA damage. Tests of selection reveal that most protein-coding genes BSEQ and related lineages are under strong or relaxed purifying selection. Taken together, our results demonstrate that while BSEQ and related Blochmanniella lineages have highly conserved content, there is considerable evolutionary diversity between them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.275

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Evolutionary BiologySame topicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influencesFrench-language works237,207