MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416312322 · doi:10.3390/cancers17223693

VHL Gene Restoration Supports RCC Reprogramming to iPSCs but Does Not Ensure Line Stability

2025· article· en· W4416312322 on OpenAlexaff
Zsuzsanna Lichner, Yasaman Shamshirgaran, Katarzyna Pieczonka, Anna Jonebring, Mark Kibschull, Oksana Shynlova, Jalna Meens, Raymond H. Kim, Laurie Ailles, Bilada Bilican, Ryan Hicks, Ian M. Rogers

Bibliographic record

VenueCancers · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReprogrammingInduced pluripotent stem cellGeneCell cultureGene expressionRegulation of gene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Modeling precancerous stages holds the promise to understand early transformation events, thereby offering the potential for personalized, targeted treatment. Because cancer hijacks developmental pathways, precancerous stages could potentially be modeled by reprogramming cancer cells to an induced pluripotent stem cell state and subsequently differentiating them to the target organs using organoid models. METHODS: We attempted reprogramming of patient-derived clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cell lines and adjacent normal renal epithelial cell lines using lentivirus or episomal reprogramming vectors. RESULTS: The cancer cells failed to reprogram while the adjacent normal cells reprogrammed with high efficiency. The von Hippel-Lindau factor (VHL) gene was re-expressed in ccRCC cells in an attempt to restore the wild-type phenotype and restore reprogramming. The VHL gene is the major tumor suppressor in ccRCC pathogenesis and a conductor of oxidative-glycolytic glucose metabolism. While its re-expression did restore the epithelial phenotype and oxidative regulation of ccRCC cells, they still failed to stably reprogram. With an optimized reprogramming workflow, VHL-corrected ccRCC cells generate NANOG+ cells; however, they remained dependent on the ectopic expression of the reprogramming factors. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that while VHL expression is necessary for cellular reprogramming of ccRCC cells, other genetic lesions in the ccRCC cells could be preventing the stabilization of the pluripotent state.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancersSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207