MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416319751 · doi:10.1007/s44337-025-00407-5

Menstrual disorder and associated factors among medical students in Uganda: a cross-sectional study

2025· article· en· W4416319751 on OpenAlexaff
Jimmy Odongo Ogwal, Edward O. Ojuka, Richard Migisha, Rosemary Namayanja, Samuel Okello, Ronald Ouma Omolo, Victor Muyambi, Jolly Joe Enyang, Abel Obeny, Ronald Ogwang, Cecilio Ángulo, Jesse Steward Opwoya, Didan Jacob Opii, David Collins Agaba

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMenstrual Health and Disorders
Canadian institutionsCanadian Rural Health Research Society
FundersMbarara University of Science and Technology
KeywordsMenstruationUnderweightPoisson regressionAffect (linguistics)AmenorrheaAbortionMenstrual cyclePregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Menstrual disorders (MD) affect 75% of women worldwide and account for the majority of morbidity in women of childbearing age. Heavy and prolonged menstruation are linked to severe anemia and its sequelae, irregular menstruation predisposes females to unwanted pregnancies, which can result in unsafe abortion with associated maternal injuries and even death. Furthermore, students suffering from PMS, dysmenorrhea, or heavy menstruation are more likely to miss lectures and exams. We determined the prevalence and factors associated with menstrual disorders among undergraduate medical students at Mbarara University of Science and Technology (MUST) in southwestern Uganda. We conducted a cross-sectional study in the Faculty of Medicine (FOM) at MUST from 2nd October, 2023 to 1st November, 2023 using consecutive sampling among the female undergraduate students, We included students from 19 to 45 years and excluded those who were either pregnant or breastfeeding. Socio-demographic, gynecological, lifestyle and clinical data were obtained through self-administered questionnaires. The prevalence of menstrual disorders was the proportion of participants with any of dysmenorrhea, Premenstrual Syndrome (PMS), infrequent, frequent, prolonged, heavy or irregular Menstruation. Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to evaluate associations between menstrual disorders and independent variables. A total of 290 students were enrolled with mean age 23.93 (± 4.40) years. The prevalence of menstrual disorders was 85.6% (249/290) (95%CI 81.83–89.90), indicates that these issues may be a common concern for young women, especially those in academic environments. Having stress [aPR 1.13, 95% CI (1.03–1.24), p = 0.007], being below 24 years [aPR 1.12, 95% CI (1.01–1.25), p = 0.034] and being underweight [aPR 1.15, 95% CI (1.08–1.22), p < 0.001] were independently associated with Menstrual disorders. More than three-quarters of medical students at MUST experience menstrual disorders, highlighting a significant health concern in this population. These findings emphasize the need for integrating menstrual health education and stress management programs into medical curricula. Health policies should prioritize screening and management of menstrual disorders, with recommendations for wellness programs such as yoga, sports, and creative activities to support student well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.758

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover MedicineSame topicMenstrual Health and DisordersFrench-language works237,207