MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416322218 · doi:10.3390/clinpract15110213

Role of Cerebral Oximetry in Reducing Postoperative End-Organ Dysfunction After Major Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial

2025· article· en· W4416322218 on OpenAlex
Matthanja Bieze, Karen Foley, W. Scott Beattie, Jo Carroll, Humara Poonawala, Lian-Kah Ti, George Djaiani

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinics and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized controlled trialOxygen saturationPulse oximetryClinical trialGeneral anaesthesiaCerebral perfusion pressureGold standard (test)Institutional review board

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background/Objectives: An increasing number of older individuals require general anaesthesia for major non-cardiac surgery, with 20% displaying postoperative complications. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) correlates with the gold standard of mixed venous oxygen saturation, indicating global perfusion. We hypothesised that rSO2-based anaesthesia reduces organ dysfunction and morbidity after major non-cardiac surgery. Methods: In Singapore and Toronto, we conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in elderly patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, after obtaining research ethics board permission and informed consent. This RCT followed the CONSORT guidelines. Patients received bilateral cerebral oximetry sensors, and the control group received standard care. In the intervention group, an algorithm restored rSO2 if it dropped 10% below baseline for >15 s by adjusting cerebral perfusion pressure, inspired oxygen concentration, end-tidal carbon dioxide, depth of anaesthesia, haemoglobin, and cardiac index. Postoperative complications and outcomes were noted. Categorical data were analysed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests and continuous data using a t-test or a Mann–Whitney U test. The study was powered for 394 patients, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic and funding constraints, this study was terminated at 101 patients. Results: Of 101 patients, 49 were randomised to the control and 52 to the intervention group. A total of 31 (63%) patients in the control group and 30 (58%) in the interventional exhibited bilateral cerebral desaturation. Time of cumulative cerebral desaturation was longer in the control group (23 ± 48 min vs. 9 ± 15 min, respectively, p = 0.01). A total of 142 algorithm-based treatments were employed, restoring rSO2 in 29 (86%) patients. Both groups displayed equal postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: In major non-cardiac surgery, cerebral desaturation is prevalent in over 85% of patients. Although algorithm-guided therapy restored rSO2 in the majority of patients, it did not result in reduced postoperative morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it