Role of Cerebral Oximetry in Reducing Postoperative End-Organ Dysfunction After Major Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: An increasing number of older individuals require general anaesthesia for major non-cardiac surgery, with 20% displaying postoperative complications. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) correlates with the gold standard of mixed venous oxygen saturation, indicating global perfusion. We hypothesised that rSO2-based anaesthesia reduces organ dysfunction and morbidity after major non-cardiac surgery. Methods: In Singapore and Toronto, we conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial in elderly patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery, after obtaining research ethics board permission and informed consent. This RCT followed the CONSORT guidelines. Patients received bilateral cerebral oximetry sensors, and the control group received standard care. In the intervention group, an algorithm restored rSO2 if it dropped 10% below baseline for >15 s by adjusting cerebral perfusion pressure, inspired oxygen concentration, end-tidal carbon dioxide, depth of anaesthesia, haemoglobin, and cardiac index. Postoperative complications and outcomes were noted. Categorical data were analysed using Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests and continuous data using a t-test or a Mann–Whitney U test. The study was powered for 394 patients, but due to the COVID-19 pandemic and funding constraints, this study was terminated at 101 patients. Results: Of 101 patients, 49 were randomised to the control and 52 to the intervention group. A total of 31 (63%) patients in the control group and 30 (58%) in the interventional exhibited bilateral cerebral desaturation. Time of cumulative cerebral desaturation was longer in the control group (23 ± 48 min vs. 9 ± 15 min, respectively, p = 0.01). A total of 142 algorithm-based treatments were employed, restoring rSO2 in 29 (86%) patients. Both groups displayed equal postoperative outcomes. Conclusions: In major non-cardiac surgery, cerebral desaturation is prevalent in over 85% of patients. Although algorithm-guided therapy restored rSO2 in the majority of patients, it did not result in reduced postoperative morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".