MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416322476 · doi:10.1159/000549603

Impact of Body Mass Index on Renal Function Impairment in Patients Treated for Renal Cell Carcinoma at High Risk of Recurrence: Key Implications for Systemic Therapy Eligibility

2025· article· en· W4416322476 on OpenAlexaff
Pietro Scilipoti, Giuseppe Rosiello, Mattia Longoni, Arianna Bettiga, Chiara Re, Giacomo Musso, Francesco Cei, Lucia Salerno, Federico Belladelli, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Alexandre Mottrie, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Salonia, Chiara Mercinelli, Antonio Cigliola, Andrea Necchi, Francesco Trevisani, Francesco Montorsi, Alessandro Larcher, Umberto Capitanio

Bibliographic record

VenueUrologia Internationalis · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal cell carcinoma treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBody mass indexRenal functionRenal cell carcinomaOverweightSystemic therapyAdjuvant therapyAdjuvantKidneyKidney cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant or salvage systemic therapy after nephrectomy for intermediate- and high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) improves overall survival. However, severe renal impairment represents a relative contraindication to systemic therapy administration. This study aimed to analyze the impact of overweight and obesity at the time of nephrectomy in determining subsequent renal function impairment and limited accessibility to systemic therapy. METHODS: Within a prospectively maintained database, we identified 795 nonmetastatic ccRCC patients at intermediate or high risk of recurrence. BMI was calculated as weight/height (kg/m2), and chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstage was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2. Multivariable Cox regression models assessed the association between BMI and the risk of CKD upstage. Cumulative incidence curves illustrated the risk of disease relapse across different risk groups. RESULTS: Overall, 504 (63%) were classified as intermediate and 291 (37%) as high risk of recurrence. The median BMI was 26 kg/m2 (IQR: 24-28), with 407 (51%) patients being overweight and 89 (11%) classified as obese. The 5-year risk of disease recurrence was 20% for intermediate and 70% for high-risk patients (p < 0.001). After accounting for patient, surgical, and tumor characteristics, the adjusted risk of CKD upstage increased from 24%-35% to 42%-61% in normal vs. overweight vs. obese patients. BMI resulted as an independent predictor of CKD upstage (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, p = 0.04). Specifically, overweight (HR: 2.11) and obese (HR: 3.26) patients were at higher risk of CKD upstage (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: BMI emerges as an important marker of vulnerability to clinically meaningful postoperative renal function decline. Patients with intermediate- or high-risk ccRCC who are overweight or obese may benefit from structured multidisciplinary evaluation, including nutritional assessment, to preserve renal reserve and maintain eligibility for adjuvant or salvage systematic treatments when indicated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUrologia InternationalisSame topicRenal cell carcinoma treatmentFrench-language works237,207