Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy outcomes are comparable in patients with synovitis treated by synovectomy and those without synovitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine whether patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) with synovitis treated by synovectomy exhibit similar outcomes to those without synovitis after 24-month follow-up. METHODS: A total of 181 patients who underwent primary APM at a single institution between 2018 and 2022 were included: 87 without synovitis and 94 with synovitis treated via synovectomy involving at least two compartments. Synovitis extent was assessed intraoperatively by the surgeon. Nine Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, including three derived from the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), were collected preoperatively and at 24 months postoperatively. Patient demographics, surgical details, preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis (OA) grade and intraoperative outerbridge chondral scores were compared between cohorts. 'Failures' underwent subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery during follow-up. 'Responders' reached the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) by 24 months. Time-to-response analysis using Cox regression compared the time to achieve MCID between groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographics between the cohorts including age, body mass index, sex, smoking status and number of comorbidities. The treated synovitis group demonstrated greater preoperative OA severity (median KL: 2 vs. 1.5; p = 0.013) and intraoperative chondral degeneration (median global outerbridge: 2 vs. 1; p < 0.001). All nine KOOS subscales improved between baseline and 24-month follow-up (all p < 0.001). At 24 months, all KOOS subscales were similar between groups (all p > 0.05), except WOMAC Stiffness, which was higher in the treated snifters group (24.9 vs. 17.9; p = 0.025). Time-to-response analysis showed no difference in time to MCID achievement (374 vs. 362 days; p = 0.727), and failure rates were also similar (7.4% vs. 11.5%; p = 0.498). CONCLUSIONS: Despite greater OA severity and chondral degeneration, snifters treated with synovectomy in patients undergoing APM did not result in worse KOOS scores, delayed clinical response or increased risk of subsequent ipsilateral knee surgery compared to APM without synovitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".