MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416327412 · doi:10.1080/07380577.2025.2589253

Why Become a Healthcare Manager? Ethically Reflecting on the Path to Leadership of Public and Private Sectors’ Occupational Therapists of Quebec-Canada

2025· article· en· W4416327412 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rébecca Gaudet, Marie-Michèle Lord, Joanie Maclure, Marie-Josée Drolet

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational Therapy In Health Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Therapy Practice and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture
KeywordsWorkloadHealth carePrivate sectorWork (physics)Dimension (graph theory)Public sectorHuman resource managementNew public managementOccupational therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pursuing management training within a health profession is motivated by multiple considerations varying according to individuals’ values, personalities, and context. This article aims to describe the Quebec-Canada occupational therapists’ motivations to become healthcare managers and their appreciation of the management (likes and dislikes/challenges), all analyzed from an ethical perspective. A descriptive phenomenologically inspired approach was used. Data were collected using sociodemographic questionnaires and semi-structured individual interviews. The verbatims were analyzed using Husserlian phenomenological reduction. Public- and private-sector managers’ groups were compared with descriptive statistics. Results were discussed using the Quadripartite Ethical Framework (Drolet; Drolet & Hudon; and Drolet & Ruest). Twenty-seven occupational therapists-managers (n = 27) from public (n = 15) and private (n = 12) sectors were interviewed. Time as clinician before starting management and training aspects were different between sectors. Three main emerging motivations to become a manager are common to both sectors: personality-related factors, external factors, and desire to improve things. Dissatisfaction with work in the public sector emerged as a fourth motivation within the private sector. In public sector, the most cited motivation was to get involved in decision-making, while it was the desire to work according to one’s ways within the private sector. For both sectors, the human dimension and the love of management were the higher appreciated aspects, whereas human resources management issues and heavy workload were the greater challenges. This study highlights duality between professional and managerial logics and the challenge of multiple loyalties. Management training does not necessarily make the work any easier. Occupational therapist managers have ideals, too often shattered by the organizational constraints encountered. Results can contribute to improve occupational therapist’ training and leadership development and to better understand ethical issues surrounding healthcare management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.353
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccupational Therapy In Health CareSame topicOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchFrench-language works237,207