MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416332590 · doi:10.1007/s00404-025-08220-2

Methotrexate plus low-dose prednisolone compared with high-dose corticosteroid therapy in the management of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis

2025· article· en· W4416332590 on OpenAlexaff
Leyla Shojaee, Nahid Nafissi, Fatemeh Niksolat Roodposhti, Kiana Shakeriastani, Kiarash Shakeriastani

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreast Lesions and Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersWake Forest University
KeywordsPrednisoloneMethotrexateGranulomatous mastitisAntimetabolitePharmacotherapyCorticosteroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory breast disease of unknown etiology. Its unpredictable course and unclear pathogenesis have made treatment a persistent clinical challenge. This study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes in patients with IGM, focusing on extending remission periods and reducing relapse rates after discontinuation of therapy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 200 patients with histopathological confirmed idiopathic granulomatous mastitis who were referred to the Teaching and Therapeutic Center at the Central Hospital of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. Patient demographics, pathological characteristics, treatment regimens, remission duration, and recurrence rates were analyzed. RESULTS: From January 2018 to December 2024, a total of 200 patients were enrolled in the study, with a mean age of 33 years (range: 18-54 years) and a mean follow-up duration of 34 months (range: 8-51 months). Patients were divided into two treatment groups: Group A received high-dose prednisolone combined with abscess drainage (n = 99), while Group B received low-dose prednisolone, abscess drainage, and methotrexate (n = 101). Group B demonstrated a significantly shorter treatment duration (11.56 ± 2.15 months) compared to Group A (14.86 ± 3.42 months; P < 0.001). The mean time to follow-up was significantly longer in Group B (35.97 ± 6.96 months) than in Group A (20.00 ± 7.02 months; P < 0.001). The recurrence rate was lower in Group B (4.9%) than in Group A (23.2%), with the difference approaching statistical significance (P = 0.057). In addition, the mean time to relapse in Group B (34.46 ± 6.50 months) was significantly longer than that of Group A (16.96 ± 5.34 months), indicating that patients receiving the combined regimen of low-dose prednisolone, drainage, and methotrexate experienced a more sustained remission period. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results, the treatment of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis, especially the moderate to severe form of the disease, using combination therapy with low-dose prednisolone and methotrexate can be associated with a reduction in treatment duration, and increase in remission duration, and a reduction in relapse, and drug side effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicBreast Lesions and CarcinomasFrench-language works237,207