MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416333230 · doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c07750

XAI-ACSM: An Ensemble-Based Explainable Artificial Intelligence Framework for the Accurate Prediction of Anticancer Small Molecules

2025· article· en· W4416333230 on OpenAlexaff
Nalini Schaduangrat, Pakpoom Mookdarsanit, Saifuddin Mahmud, Kanthida Kusonmano, Lawankorn Mookdarsanit, Watshara Shoombuatong

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Omega · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersKing Mongkut's University of Technology ThonburiNational Research Council of ThailandMahidol UniversityChandrakasem Rajabhat University
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Support vector machineAnticancer drugBaseline (sea)Feature (linguistics)InterpretabilityDrugConjunction (astronomy)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer continues to be a leading cause of mortality worldwide. While conventional therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy remain mainstays in clinical oncology, these approaches often result in systemic toxicity, adverse side effects, and the emergence of drug resistance. Small-molecule drugs have gained prominence as potent anticancer agents due to their favorable drug-like profiles, enabling oral bioavailability and systemic efficacy. The incorporation of computational methodologies has further revolutionized anticancer drug discovery. In particular, machine learning (ML) techniques have shown considerable success in accelerating the identification and optimization of small-molecule candidates. Therefore, we propose a novel ensemble-based explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework, termed XAI-ACSM, for the identification and characterization of anticancer small molecules (ACSMs) using only SMILES notation. XAI-ACSM was initially developed through a comprehensive evaluation of five popular ML algorithms in conjunction with 14 molecular descriptors derived from five different feature encoding schemes. Then, these molecular descriptors and ML algorithms were employed to develop 70 baseline models. Finally, the most effective baseline models were selected and integrated to provide high-precision prediction outcomes using a probability averaging strategy. Both cross-validation and independent tests showed that XAI-ACSM outperformed its baseline models and the existing method. Remarkably, XAI-ACSM achieved an accuracy of 0.826, specificity of 0.926, and MCC of 0.666 over the independent test data set, which were 3.65, 9.60, and 8.63% higher than the existing method. Furthermore, XAI-ACSM was applied to identify potential ACSMs among FDA-approved drugs, with predictions validated through molecular docking against the most prevalent cancer targets. XAI-ACSM offers a practical approach for screening large chemical libraries to identify potential ACSMs, particularly among compounds with limited existing characterization, while helping to reduce time and resource requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS OmegaSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207