MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416334069 · doi:10.1038/s43856-025-01191-0

Machine learning identifies clusters of multimorbidity among decedents with inflammatory bowel disease

2025· article· en· W4416334069 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gemma Postill, Vinyas Harish, Ijeoma Uchenna Itanyi, Furong Tang, Emmalin Buajitti, M Ellen Kuenzig, Laura C. Rosella, Eric I. Benchimol

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Disease Management Strategies
Canadian institutionsTrillium Health CentreMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationPublic Health Ontario
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoAmerican College of Gastroenterology
KeywordsMultimorbidityInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseComorbidityMEDLINECluster (spacecraft)Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multimorbidity is the co-occurrence of two or more chronic conditions in one person. Providing quality, patient-centered care requires understanding multimorbidity. Our objective was to identify patterns of multimorbidity that occur prior to death among people with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Using a retrospective population-based matched cohort derived from linked health administrative data of individuals with and without IBD who died between 2010 and 2020 in Ontario, Canada, we compared multimorbidity accumulation and leveraged unsupervised machine learning to identify multimorbidity clusters. Here we show decedents with IBD have a greater prevalence of complex multimorbidity (42% vs 34% with 8+ conditions, standardized difference: 22%). Among those with IBD at death, IBD is commonly developed as their first condition. At death, people with IBD have high prevalences of osteo- and other arthritis (77%), hypertension (73%), mood disorders (69%), renal failure (50%) and cancer (46%). Among those with IBD, we identify 3 clusters: ( $$\alpha $$ ) mood disorder and/or osteo- and other arthritis; ( $$\beta $$ ) cancer and low multimorbidity; ( $$\gamma $$ ) cardiovascular comorbidities. The clusters that we identify are stable across numerous validation techniques, including re-derivation and sex-specific clustering. These findings can inform future research and potential multimorbidity care in populations with IBD. Consideration of these clusters also lends to the need for further research, guidelines, and care programs to manage distinct subgroups of comorbidities among those with IBD, highlighting avenues for greater personalized care. People with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have inflammation in their digestive system that can cause stomach pain and diarrhoea. They often also live with other long-term health conditions. This study aimed to understand how different health conditions occur together before death in people with IBD. We used health records to compare people with and without IBD who died between 2010 and 2020. We assessed the conditions that occur with IBD and looked for common patterns of conditions co-occurring using computational methods. We found that people with IBD commonly had other health conditions, specifically arthritis, high blood pressure and mood disorders. Three main patterns of health condition co-occurrence in IBD emerged. These findings highlight the importance of developing tailored care programs to better support people with IBD facing multiple health challenges. Postill et al. apply unsupervised machine learning methods to cluster longitudinal administrative health data of deceased people with IBD. Their model identifies three clusters of multimorbidity present at death among those with IBD: mood disorder and/or osteo- and other arthritis; cancer and low multimorbidity; and cardiovascular comorbidities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.568

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications MedicineSame topicChronic Disease Management StrategiesFrench-language works237,207