Late Morbidity and Mortality in Survivors of Childhood Ependymoma: A Report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Treatment of childhood ependymoma evolved from 1970 to 1999 by reducing radiation volumes and incorporating chemotherapy. The impact of these changes on long-term health outcomes remains unknown. In this report, we evaluated temporal changes in all-cause and cause-specific late mortality, chronic health conditions (CHCs), and subsequent neoplasms (SNs) in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) cohort of adult survivors of pediatric ependymoma, diagnosed between 1970 and 1999. Methods: A total of 404 five-year survivors of ependymoma (47.5% female, 80.7% non-Hispanic White, median 6 (range 0–20) years at diagnosis, 22 (5–49) years from diagnosis) diagnosed between 1970 and 1999 and enrolled in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study were evaluated for late (>5 years from diagnosis) mortality, SNs, and CHCs. Outcomes were analyzed by diagnosis decade, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy exposure. Gray’s test compared cumulative incidences. Multivariable piecewise exponential models estimated relative risks (RRs). Results: Whole-brain radiation exposure decreased over time (42.9% (1970s) to 2.7% (1990s)), while focal radiation (21.4% to 68.9%), and chemotherapy (29.5% to 50.2%) use increased. Fifteen-year all-cause late mortality (incidence, 95% CI) remained similar across decades: 1970s (9.3%, 3.4–18.8%), 1980s (14.7%, 9.4–21.2%), 1990s (10.3%, 6.7–14.9%). All-cause late mortality was higher after treatment with whole-brain radiation (22.5%, 11.2–36.5%) compared to focal radiation (11.4%, 7.5–16.1%) or no brain radiation (3.5%, 0.9–9.1%) (p < 0.001), and with chemotherapy (14.4%, 9.6–20.0%) versus without (6.8%, 3.8–11.0%) (p = 0.004). Compared to no brain radiation, the RR (95% CI) of grade 3–4 CHCs increased among survivors treated with focal (2.6, 1.3–5.4) and whole-brain radiation (3.5, 1.5–8.1), while chemotherapy was not associated with CHCs or SNs. Conclusions: Despite reduced radiation volumes and increased use of chemotherapy, late mortality and morbidity among pediatric ependymoma survivors remained largely unchanged across treatment decades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".