MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416352511 · doi:10.1186/s12969-025-01166-4

Mental health screening in pediatric rheumatology: a feasibility study

2025· article· en· W4416352511 on OpenAlexafffund
Sarah James, Laura Lolacher, Karen Hodge, Janine Slavec, Nick McPhate, Kristin Houghton, Jaime Guzmán, Lori Tucker

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
FundersBC Children's Hospital
KeywordsMental healthDepression (economics)AnxietyRheumatologyPopulationHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite the call for inclusion of routine mental health screening in pediatric rheumatology practice, the practical aspects of implementation in real world clinical settings have not yet been demonstrated. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the acceptability and practicality of mental health screening in patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) during routine visits at a pediatric hospital multidisciplinary clinic; (2) to understand the frequency and severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms within this sample. METHODS: Patients with JIA aged 8-17 were invited to participate during their routine clinic appointments. Patients completed three questionnaires on an iPad: PROMIS Pediatric Anxiety (v3), PROMIS Pediatric Depression (v3), and an acceptability questionnaire. Caregivers completed an acceptability questionnaire. Participants were provided with feedback on their scoring profile and relevant mental health resources during their clinic visit. RESULTS: Forty patient-parent dyads participated during routine follow-up appointments at the Rheumatology Clinic at BC Children's Hospital between April and August 2024 (mean patient age = 13.5 years; 23 (57.5%) females). Overall, 92% of patients and 95% of caregivers reported the screening process to be 'Acceptable' or 'Completely Acceptable'. The mean PROMIS Anxiety t-score was 51.79 (SD = 11.06) and the mean PROMIS Depression t-score was 50.54 (SD = 7.62). Six patients (15%) had elevated or very elevated anxiety scores, and two patients (5%) had elevated depression scores. CONCLUSION: There was high acceptability of the mental health screening process among patients and caregivers. The mean anxiety and depression scores were similar to the general population with a small proportion of patients reporting elevated scores. Mental health screening is practical within rheumatology clinic visits and should be considered by health professionals providing care for youth with JIA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric RheumatologySame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207