TÉCUM: A New Transition Program for Young People With Epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The transition from pediatric to adult health care for people with epilepsy is a critical period that requires careful planning to ensure optimal patient well-being. Adolescents with epilepsy face health-related and social challenges (e.g., psychiatric disorders, treatment nonadherence, family planning, and medico-legal issues). Recent Findings: The TÉCUM (Transition en Épilepsie Complexe de l'Université de Montréal) program aims to establish a sustainable model of transition care. Key initiatives include patient-oriented symposia (covering medical and social topics), a website that is a hub for available public and community resources, and a standardized online questionnaire to assess patient psychosocial well-being and transition readiness to tailor interventions. Implications for Practice: Our innovative program has established new educational initiatives for patients and their families and measures to ensure optimal management of their epilepsy as well as their psychosocial needs. We anticipate that the TÉCUM program will positively influence adolescents and young adults with epilepsy across Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".