MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416377695 · doi:10.63564/jnep.v15n11p33

Lessons learned from nurse leaders during the covid pandemic-implications for prelicensure baccalaureate nursing programs

2025· article· W4416377695 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Judith Ann Fruiterman, Claudia Diventi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMentorshipExperiential learningAcute careCompetence (human resources)CurriculumNurse educationCore competencyPreparednessWorkforce

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and objective: This phenomenological inquiry explored the lived experience of acute care nurse leaders during the pandemic to better understand their experience of vulnerability as it contributes to enhancing the leadership curriculum in baccalaureate prelicensure nursing programs. Methods: Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight nurse leaders using a Gadamerian, hermeneutic, phenomenological framework. Data analysis included researcher immersion, understanding, abstraction, synthesis/theme development and finally, illumination and illustration of the phenomena. Results: Final analysis of the data revealed four interrelated major themes: Life Changing Experience/The Emergence of a New Unit Culture, Critical Leadership Functions for Supporting and Sustaining the Nursing Workforce, Managing Patient/Personal/Political and Professional Boundaries, and The Essentiality of C-Suite Contribution to Operations. Conclusions: The study suggests a requirement to continue to train student nurses on core competencies of nurse leadership but encourages a shift from didactic and perhaps stagnant pedagogy to a more robust, participatory, experiential model and one that affords students leadership clinical placements and both role modeling and short-term mentorship experiences. This approach to student learning should include a competency-based model of instruction and assessment, utilization of experiential learning to help students apply theoretical knowledge to practice and student engagement in exercises in reflection towards developing self-awareness. Role modeling and mentorship opportunities should be prioritized. Suggestions for future research include exploring the application of this study’s findings to acute care setting new leader orientation programs and studies that measure the changes in leadership competence among nursing students after participating in the new curriculum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.362
GPT teacher head0.583
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Education and Practice→Same topicCOVID-19 and Mental Health→French-language works237,207→