Factores asociados al deterioro cognitivo en adultos mayores que acuden al Centro Materno Infantil Juan Pablo II, Lima, 2024
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La investigación tuvo como objetivo analizar los factores asociados al deterioro cognitivo en adultos mayores que acudieron al Centro Materno Infantil Juan Pablo II. Se trató de un estudio con enfoque cuantitativo, analítico con diseño casos y controles, retrospectivo. La muestra estuvo conformada por 213 adultos mayores usuarios del Centro Materno Infantil. Los instrumentos utilizados fueron el Test de evaluación cognitiva Montreal MOCA; un cuestionario para el registro de factores sociodemográfico y estilos de vida; y una ficha de recolección donde se registró el peso y talla de los participantes. Los resultados mostraron que 116 adultos mayores (54.5%) de la muestra presentaron deterioro cognitivo. Los factores sociodemográficos que actuaron como riesgo fueron la edad mayor de 69 años (OR=2.25), el sexo masculino (OR=2.37), el estado civil viudo (OR =1.49) y divorciado (OR=2.53); y la procedencia de la Sierra (OR=0.38) y de la Selva (OR=0.40) actuó como factor protector. En el caso de los estilos de vida, la actividad física (OR=0.35) representa un factor protector. Por lo tanto, se concluye que tanto los factores sociodemográficos como los de estilo de vida se encuentran asociados estadísticamente al deterioro cognitivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".