MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416384891 · doi:10.1002/we.70071

Virtual Sensing of Wind Turbine Loads With Multi‐Hidden Markov Models for Above‐Rated Wind Speeds

2025· article· en· W4416384891 on OpenAlex
Victor Vantilborgh, Nezmin Kayedpour, Tom Lefebvre, Annelies Coene, Guillaume Crevecoeur

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueWind Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Health Monitoring Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVlaamse regeringAlberta InnovatesFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekUniversiteit GentFlanders Make
KeywordsTurbineWind powerTowerReliability (semiconductor)AerodynamicsWind speedMoment (physics)Probabilistic logicStructural health monitoringBending moment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The growing demand for wind energy necessitates efficient health monitoring strategies to ensure the long‐term reliability of wind turbines. Monitoring critical loads, such as flapwise blade root moments and tower base fore‐aft moments, is crucial for preventing turbine fatigue and failure. However, direct measurements through physical sensors are costly, time‐consuming, and limited to specific locations. This study introduces a probabilistic data‐driven virtual sensing framework that uses multi‐hidden Gauss‐Markov model (Multi‐HGMM) to estimate these loads by capturing the relationship between measurable quantities and key structural metrics, without requiring extensive physical sensors. An expectation–maximization algorithm is used to determine the HGMM parameters from a comprehensive dataset. This dataset includes routinely recorded SCADA data, such as wind speed, rotor speed, and pitch angles, along with additional key features that were carefully selected for their relevance to load estimation. In a subsequent stage that includes operational measurement data, the probabilistic HGMM can be used to estimate loads. We validate our approach on a 5‐MW wind turbine model developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), for above‐rated wind speeds where turbines face heightened loads due to increased aerodynamic forces, critical for structural integrity. The results demonstrated that the multi‐HGMM approach achieved a mean absolute error of approximately 6% for estimating both the tower base moment and flapwise moment when incorporating tower top accelerations and shaft bending moments alongside baseline features. By reducing reliance on physical sensors, this virtual sensing methodology offers a scalable, cost‐effective solution for wind turbine monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it