MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416388921 · doi:10.3390/medicina61112061

The Effect of Humeral Head Depressor Strengthening on Individuals with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome

2025· article· en· W4416388921 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Utku Kurtaran, Tuba Yerlikaya, Barış Yenen, Ahmet Özgül

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicina · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotator cuffSubacromial impingementProprioceptionRehabilitationShoulder Impingement SyndromeRange of motionTendonElbow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objectives: Subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS) is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems affecting the shoulder joint. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program targeting humeral head depressor muscles on symptoms in individuals with SAPS. Materials and Methods: Participants were sequentially assigned to study and control groups in a quasi-randomized design. While the control group received standard physical therapy and rehabilitation, the study group underwent a combined progressive exercise program, including humeral head depressor strengthening, peri-articular muscle exercises, scapular stabilization, and proprioceptive training. Acromio–humeral distance (AHD) and tendon thickness measurements were evaluated via ultrasonography (USG), while pain intensity, upper-extremity disability, and kinesiophobia were measured using the VAS and McGill Pain Questionnaire, DASH-T, and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, respectively. Results: Both the study and control groups showed statistically significant increments in AHD compared to the baseline. The first and final measurements changed from 7.92 mm to 10.54 mm and from 7.72 mm to 8.41 mm, respectively. However, the increase in AHD was greater in the study group relative to the control group, and the value was statistically significant. The study group showed significant improvements in pain and disability. Kinesiophobia levels, on the other hand, decreased in both groups, but a greater decrease was observed in the study group. Conclusions: In this study, both the study and control groups showed an increase in AHD, but the combined exercise program targeting humeral head depressor muscles resulted in a greater improvement. Reduced tendon thickness indicated the eased motion of the rotator cuff, supporting the improvements in pain and disability. The program had a positive impact on psychosocial parameters, including pain-related kinesiophobia. Given the limited literature on the effects of such exercises on AHD and tendon thickness, this study provides an original contribution. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07228455.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicinaSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207