MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study on the Temperature Change Trends and Influencing Factors in Changsha

2025· article· W4416389681 on OpenAlexaff
Ruijie Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Computational Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Heat Island Mitigation
Canadian institutionsPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban heat islandUrbanizationClimate changeSustainabilityEnergy consumptionGlobal warmingUrban climatePopulationCurrent (fluid)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the capital of Hunan Province, Changsha has been rapidly urbanized in recent decades. However, increasing population density, traffic pressure, and energy consumption have a significant anthropogenic impact on the regional climate. Therefore, this paper reviews the spatial and temporal changes in Changsha’s temperature, urban heat island effect, extreme high temperature and heat wave problems, and the application of multi-source data. The study noted a significant rise in Changsha's average annual temperature, an increase in the frequency and intensity of heat waves, and a significant urban heat island effect, primarily driven by urbanization and global warming. Meanwhile, urban blue-green spaces can bring localized cooling of 1 to 3°C, playing a positive role in alleviating high temperatures. To address climate challenges, academics have proposed measures such as low-carbon development, green buildings, protection of blue and green spaces, construction of ventilation corridors, and multi-source data monitoring. However, current research lacks consistency in data, mechanism simulation, and adaptation strategies. Future research recommends strengthening long-term data construction, multi-source data integration, and mechanism research to help Changsha achieve sustainable development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.599

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Computational EngineeringSame topicUrban Heat Island MitigationFrench-language works237,207