MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416392455 · doi:10.1186/s13102-025-01394-x

Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the return-to-sport scale after shoulder instability in Iranian athletes

2025· article· en· W4416392455 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aynollah Naderi, Hossein ChoromZadeh, Hans Degens

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicShoulder Injury and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAthletesReliability (semiconductor)Construct validityExploratory factor analysisScale (ratio)Internal consistencyAnxietyValidityPsychometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Psychological readiness is critical for successful return to sport (RTS) after shoulder instability, yet no validated Persian-language tool exists for this purpose. This study aimed to translate, adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Persian Shoulder Instability–Return to Sport Index (SI-RSI-Pr) in Iranian athletes. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 93 athletes (mean age = 27.8 ± 5.0 years) with unilateral shoulder instability. The SI-RSI-Pr was translated using forward–backward procedures. Structural validity was assessed via exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Construct validity was evaluated through correlations with the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-17), and Walch-Duplay Score (WDS). Known-groups validity compared athletes who returned to sport versus those who did not. Reliability was tested via internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) and test–retest reliability (ICC) over a 7–10-day interval. RESULTS: EFA confirmed a three-factor structure (Confidence in RTS, Fear and Anxiety about RTS, Psychological Burden of RTS), explaining 78% of variance with strong factor loadings (0.744–0.955) and good model fit (RMSEA = 0.070, TLI = 0.966). The SI-RSI-Pr showed high internal consistency (α = 0.89–0.94) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.90–0.95). Construct validity was supported by correlations with WDS (r = 0.74), TSK-17 (r = -0.58), and WOSI (r = -0.57). Known-groups validity was confirmed, distinguishing returners from non-returners (AUC = 0.765, cut-off = 61.67, specificity = 92.86%). The scale exhibited strong feasibility and minimal floor/ceiling effects. CONCLUSIONS: The SI-RSI-Pr, rigorously adapted for Persian-speaking athletes, is a reliable and valid tool for assessing psychological readiness to RTS after shoulder instability, supporting return-to-sport decisions in Persian-speaking athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Sports Science Medicine and RehabilitationSame topicShoulder Injury and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207