MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416393212 · doi:10.1080/20008066.2025.2587483

The role of the first interpersonal trauma exposure’s developmental period on fear regulation processes among adult women

2025· article· en· W4416393212 on OpenAlexafffund
Émilie Rudd, Alexe Bilodeau-Houle, Myriam Beaudin, Valérie Bouchard, Marie‐France Marin

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean journal of psychotraumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsExtinction (optical mineralogy)Interpersonal communicationFear conditioningRecallAssociation (psychology)Young adultInterpersonal relationship

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Interpersonal trauma is associated with a higher risk of developing symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following trauma exposure. PTSD, which is more prevalent among women, is characterised by heightened fear and difficulties regulating it. Although fear regulation deficits in PTSD are well documented, considerable variability exists in how individuals learn and regulate fear. Brain regions involved in fear learning and regulation follow distinct developmental trajectories and are more sensitive to stress at certain timepoints. As exposure to severe stress (e.g. trauma) could influence the development and/or functioning of brain regions involved in fear learning and regulation, the timing of such exposure may potentially induce differential effects.Objective: This study explores the association between the developmental period – childhood (0–11 years), adolescence (12–17 years), adulthood (18 years and older) – during which the first interpersonal trauma occurred, and fear learning and regulation processes in a sample of adult women.Methods: Ninety-five women with a history of interpersonal trauma reported their age at first exposure and underwent a validated two-day fear conditioning and extinction protocol (conditioning and extinction on one day, followed by extinction memory recall 24 h later). Skin conductance responses (SCR) were used to index physiological fear levels.Results: During fear conditioning and extinction, no group differences emerged. During the early phase of extinction memory recall, women whose first trauma occurred during adolescence or adulthood showed higher SCRs than those exposed during childhood (Time × Trauma age group: F(6, 2078.05) = 7.78, p < .001).Conclusion: These findings suggest that the developmental timing of trauma exposure influences fear regulation in adulthood, highlighting potential windows of vulnerability that could inform targeted interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean journal of psychotraumatologySame topicMemory and Neural MechanismsFrench-language works237,207