MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416404831 · doi:10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100608

Real-world outcomes after anti–IL-5/anti–IL-5Rα treatment for hypereosinophilic syndrome: Systematic literature review

2025· article· en· W4416404831 on OpenAlexaff
Priya Jain, Jennifer Rowell, Christopher Edmonds, Michael Stokes, Ning Ding, S.Y. Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Global · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes
Canadian institutionsCégep de Saint-Laurent
FundersAstraZeneca
KeywordsSystematic reviewMEDLINEMedical literatureClinical trialMeta-analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5 receptor alpha (anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα) treatments have potential to improve outcomes in hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), as demonstrated in clinical trials. Objective: We sought to understand the real-world outcomes of anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα treatments in patients with HES. Methods: This systematic literature review searched English-language articles (November 4, 2015, to October 31, 2023) and conference abstracts (January 1, 2021, to October 31, 2023) from MEDLINE/Embase and select conferences for publications containing outcomes for patients with HES receiving anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab [approved], reslizumab) or anti-IL-5Rα (benralizumab) treatment in the real world. Meta-analyses and clinical trials were excluded. Outcomes included treatment response, blood eosinophil (bEOS) counts, and oral corticosteroid (OCS) receipt. No formal bias assessment was conducted. Results: Five cohort studies (192 participants) and 55 case reports (70 participants) were identified. In cohort studies, median age was 44.0 to 61.8 years; 33.3% to 62.9% were female, and 45.5% to 100% had idiopathic HES. Mean (standard deviation) age in case reports (n = 68/70) was 38.5 (23.7) years; 40.0% (n = 28/70) were female, and 67.2% (n = 39/58) had idiopathic HES. Across 4 cohort studies, most patients had reduced or no HES flares after mepolizumab or benralizumab. In patients from case reports, 13 had HES flares (mepolizumab, n = 12/54; benralizumab, n = 1/13) after anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα initiation. Mean bEOS counts were reduced by 53.0% to 100% across 3 cohort studies and by 95.0% in case reports. Of those receiving benralizumab or mepolizumab, OCS dose was reduced in 49.0% to 100% of patients from cohort studies, and by ≥50% in 29 of 70 patients from case reports. Conclusion: Real-world anti-IL-5/anti-IL-5Rα therapy in HES is associated with fewer flares as well as reductions in bEOS counts and OCS dose, although confirmatory studies in larger populations are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.010
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology GlobalSame topicEosinophilic Disorders and SyndromesFrench-language works237,207