Sarah's story: A Canadian narrative case study and systems map of the complex barriers IPV victim-survivors and their children must navigate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the most frequently reported forms of violence and child maltreatment in Canada, especially in the province of Saskatchewan. The disconnection of helping systems is a prominent barrier to safety and justice for mothers, children, and families. Part of a larger Canadian study, the perspectives of IPV victim-survivors were explored to determine how child protection and collateral support services respond to IPV reports in Saskatchewan. Participants included three IPV victim-survivors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and thematically analyzed through a critical feminist lens. A composite character of the participants was created as a narrative case study. A mapping of the intersectional complexities of IPV was developed to better understand the phenomena. According to participants, intergenerational trauma and violence normalization contributed to unhealthy conceptualizations about their intimate relationships, including a lack of awareness about coercive control. Victim-survivors and their children were distrustful of helping systems due to feeling powerless and traumatized, primarily by child protection and legal systems, where interactions were at times experienced as discriminatory. They also faced barriers with other support services. Despite recent practice and policy improvements, the responsibilization of victim-survivors continues, driven by structural and systemic issues including sexism, discrimination and ongoing colonialism. Echoed in IPV studies globally, collaborative systemic change is necessary to reduce and prevent IPV and child maltreatment. This cultural shift should include prioritizing perpetrator accountability and increasing education and public awareness of IPV. • Intimate partner violence has deleterious impacts on survivors and children • Structural and systemic issues such as sexism and racism exacerbate the problem • Further harm occurs through victim-blaming and lack of perpetrator accountability • Education and public awareness are critical to reducing and preventing violence • Child protection, legal, and other services must collaborate for meaningful change
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".