MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416406853 · doi:10.1016/j.deepre.2025.100232

Numerical and experimental studies of the natural mixing behavior between an uncemented paste backfill and dumped waste rock in stopes from laboratory toward field conditions. Part I: Calibration and validation of a numerical model

2025· article· en· W4416406853 on OpenAlex
Yuyu Zhang, Li Li, Serge Ouellet, Louis-Philippe Gélinas

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep Resources Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsAgnico Eagle (Canada)Polytechnique MontréalUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCalibrationNatural (archaeology)Mixing (physics)Field (mathematics)Waste disposal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Underground mining operations generate large volumes of waste rock (W R ). Transporting this material to the surface requires significant energy and incurs operational costs. As an alternative, W R can be directly dumped into stopes being filled with cemented paste backfill (CPB), reducing both costs and greenhouse gas emissions. However, inadequate dumping may lead to poor mixing between cohesionless W R and CPB, resulting in fill mass collapse during or after adjacent stope excavation. Understanding and quantifying the natural mixing between dumped W R and CPB is therefore critical; yet, such studies are scarce. A major challenge lies in replicating large-scale field behavior through limited laboratory-scale tests using scalped (truncated) W R samples. Numerical modeling becomes essential to capture size effects related to both stope and W R particle sizes. In this study, a discrete element method (DEM)-based numerical model was employed. It was first calibrated using repose angle tests on W R samples with varying maximum particle sizes ( d max ), prepared using the scalping-down technique. All model parameters were determined through direct measurements, except for the rolling resistance coefficient ( µ r ) between W R particles, which should be obtained through numerical calibration. Initially, it was assumed that the µ r would vary with d max , in line with the observed increase in repose angle with larger d max . Surprisingly, calibration showed that µ r was not very sensitive to changes in d max , contradicting the experimental trend. Further investigation revealed that repose angle measurements are influenced by the quantity of material used; when sufficient W R mass is employed, the repose angle also becomes independent of d max . This confirms that scalped samples can reliably represent in situ W R in repose angle tests. The scalping technique is thus validated for use in laboratory piles tests. The predictive capability of the calibrated model is further supported by strong agreement with additional experimental data. This calibrated and validated numerical DEM model can now be confidently applied to analyze the mechanical behavior of W R -based infrastructures across varying particle sizes and field conditions. Its application to simulate the natural mixing between dumped W R and uncemented paste backfill is presented in Part II of this companion study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it