MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416409401 · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.128903

A review of the application of deep eutectic solvents for metal recovery from diverse secondary sources

2025· article· en· W4416409401 on OpenAlex
Fereshteh Moradi, Francis Bougie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Liquids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEutectic systemResource recoveryEnvironmental pollutionLead (geology)Base metalSustainable developmentCharacterization (materials science)Heavy metalsMunicipal solid waste

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the growing demand for critical, strategic, and precious metals across various industries has led to a worldwide shortage. The increasing disposal of metal-containing waste poses significant environmental and health risks while also accelerating the depletion of natural resources. Given the supply risks, environmental hazards, and challenges associated with extracting these metals from primary ores, it is vital to develop sustainable methods for recovering them from secondary sources. Metal recovery has garnered research interest due to its essential role in promoting a circular economy. Metallurgical processes, such as pyrometallurgy, bioleaching, and hydrometallurgy, often lead to secondary pollution and economic challenges. Methods based on solvometallurgy and green chemistry, such as the use of deep eutectic solvents (DESs), offer potential for separating metals from waste. DESs provide a sustainable approach for selective recovery, potentially replacing mineral acids while minimizing wastewater production. This paper provides a literature survey on the extraction of metals from sources including electrical and industrial waste, minerals, biological materials, and environmental samples using DESs. It discusses concepts, specifications, and characterization methods related to DESs. Additionally, the article classifies the techniques used for metal separation and recovery with DESs, along with key parameters that influence efficiency. The review emphasizes the selective and high-efficiency recovery of various metals using DESs. It highlights the necessity of designing DESs with low viscosity, strong coordination, and high reducibility for optimal separation. We hope that the challenges and opportunities for advancing metal recovery through DESs are clearly outlined, providing a roadmap for new applications of DES technology. • Deep eutectic solvents recover metals from electronic, industrial, and mineral waste. • Review covers extraction from batteries, magnets, solar panels, and biological sources. • Key solvent properties drive efficient and selective metal recovery. • Eco-friendly solvents reduce wastewater and replace harmful mineral acids. • Guidance provided for designing deep eutectic solvents for sustainability

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it