MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416409401 · doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2025.128903

A review of the application of deep eutectic solvents for metal recovery from diverse secondary sources

2025· article· en· W4416409401 on OpenAlexafffund
Fereshteh Moradi, Francis Bougie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Liquids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExtraction and Separation Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEutectic systemResource recoveryEnvironmental pollutionLead (geology)Base metalSustainable developmentCharacterization (materials science)Heavy metalsMunicipal solid waste

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the growing demand for critical, strategic, and precious metals across various industries has led to a worldwide shortage. The increasing disposal of metal-containing waste poses significant environmental and health risks while also accelerating the depletion of natural resources. Given the supply risks, environmental hazards, and challenges associated with extracting these metals from primary ores, it is vital to develop sustainable methods for recovering them from secondary sources. Metal recovery has garnered research interest due to its essential role in promoting a circular economy. Metallurgical processes, such as pyrometallurgy, bioleaching, and hydrometallurgy, often lead to secondary pollution and economic challenges. Methods based on solvometallurgy and green chemistry, such as the use of deep eutectic solvents (DESs), offer potential for separating metals from waste. DESs provide a sustainable approach for selective recovery, potentially replacing mineral acids while minimizing wastewater production. This paper provides a literature survey on the extraction of metals from sources including electrical and industrial waste, minerals, biological materials, and environmental samples using DESs. It discusses concepts, specifications, and characterization methods related to DESs. Additionally, the article classifies the techniques used for metal separation and recovery with DESs, along with key parameters that influence efficiency. The review emphasizes the selective and high-efficiency recovery of various metals using DESs. It highlights the necessity of designing DESs with low viscosity, strong coordination, and high reducibility for optimal separation. We hope that the challenges and opportunities for advancing metal recovery through DESs are clearly outlined, providing a roadmap for new applications of DES technology. • Deep eutectic solvents recover metals from electronic, industrial, and mineral waste. • Review covers extraction from batteries, magnets, solar panels, and biological sources. • Key solvent properties drive efficient and selective metal recovery. • Eco-friendly solvents reduce wastewater and replace harmful mineral acids. • Guidance provided for designing deep eutectic solvents for sustainability

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular LiquidsSame topicExtraction and Separation ProcessesFrench-language works237,207