Phase-Only Zero-Forcing for Secure Wireless Communication in Multi-User Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial noise (AN) transmission is a physical layer security technique in multi-antenna wireless communication systems. Synthetic noise is broadcast to all receivers except designated legitimate users via beamforming in the legitimate users' null space. We consider AN transmission employing a single RF chain and analog beamforming, where beamforming vectors maintain constant magnitude while allowing arbitrary phases. Our primary objective is to design a constant-magnitude vector capable of nullifying multiple users' channel vectors simultaneously. To tackle this zero-forcing problem, we propose a novel successive partition zero-forcing (SPZF) scheme, which transforms the multi-user zero-forcing task into optimizing channel partitioning to minimize outage probability. The SPZF scheme can be generalized to any number of users, but our analysis focuses on the two-user case. Theoretical analysis reveals that our proposed SPZF scheme can attain arbitrarily low outage probability in the limit of large number of transmit antenna. We present three partition algorithms (random, iterative, and genetic) to minimize the outage probability. The outage probabilities and secrecy rates of the three partition algorithms are compared via numerical simulations. We find that the more advanced partition algorithms (iterative and genetic) achieve higher secrecy rates than the random algorithm, particularly under conditions of high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), large number of eavesdroppers, or small number of transmit antennas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".