Tucatinib and trastuzumab emtansine for patients with previously treated HER2-positive locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: primary analysis of the randomized phase III trial HER2CLIMB-02
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is a standard treatment option in patients with previously treated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/MBC). Here, we report the efficacy and safety of tucatinib in combination with T-DM1 compared with T-DM1 alone from the phase III HER2CLIMB-02 study (NCT03975647). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had HER2-positive LA/MBC that had been previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane in any setting; these included patients with brain metastases (BMs). Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg intravenously every 21 days) combined with either tucatinib (300 mg orally twice daily) in the tucatinib arm or placebo (orally twice daily) in the control arm. RESULTS: In total, 463 patients were randomly assigned. After a median follow-up duration of 24.4 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.5 months in the tucatinib arm and 7.4 months in the control arm [hazard ratio (HR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.95, P = 0.0163]. A PFS benefit was observed across all prespecified subgroups, including in patients with BMs. Interim overall survival analysis results were immature. The median OS was not reached in the tucatinib arm and was 38.0 months in the control arm (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.87-1.74). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) associated with any treatment discontinuation and of grade ≥3 TEAEs were higher in the tucatinib arm than in the control arm (22.1% versus 11.6% and 68.8% versus 41.2%, respectively). The most common grade ≥3 TEAEs in the tucatinib arm were elevated alanine aminotransferase (16.5%) and aspartate aminotransferase levels (16.5%) (versus 2.6% for both in the control arm). CONCLUSION: The addition of tucatinib to T-DM1 improved PFS in patients with previously treated HER2-positive LA/MBC, including patients with BMs, and exhibited a manageable safety profile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".