MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416411539 · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.70205

Plant litter effects on soil carbon stabilization and nitrogen availability: A trade‐off and some versatile species

2025· article· en· W4416411539 on OpenAlexaff
Grégoire T. Freschet, Janna Wambsganss, Vincent Poirier, Raoul Huys

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsNitrogenPlant litterLitterEcological stoichiometrySoil carbonAbiotic componentNitrogen cycleSoil fertilityStoichiometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Globally, the constrained stoichiometry of living organisms is responsible for the coupling of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) elements in living organic matter, with afterlife effects in dead organic matter. This coupling has long been thought to foster trade‐offs among several key functions of ecosystems, such as soil fertility and C sequestration. However, while there is evidence for a general coupling of C and N cycling in ecosystems, there are many ways in which these cycles also diverge, both temporally and spatially, under the influence of multiple biotic and abiotic drivers. Here, focusing on the role of plant residues in feeding and steering the C and N cycles in soil, we examine how 24 leaf and root litters with contrasting chemistry differentially influence the temporal release of compounds with varying C:N stoichiometry to soil, and how C and N elements end up as stabilized (mineral‐associated organic matter, MAOM) or more bioavailable organic (particulate organic matter, POM) or mineral forms (e.g. CO 2 , NO 3 − , NH 4 + ). There were major differences in the C:N stoichiometry of compounds released during decomposition, from low C:N early on to very high C:N at later stages. We observed a trade‐off in the role of litters towards increasing soil N availability (i.e. N in the soil solution) versus soil C stabilization (i.e. C in MAOM). Slow‐decomposing litters (with high lignin and low N concentrations, C‐poor leachates), particularly roots, favoured soil C stabilization over N availability. For each gram of litter decomposed, roots contributed 33% more C to the MAOM fraction of the soil, whereas leaves contributed 87% more N to the soil solution. This pattern was strongly driven (44% of variance explained) by the contrasting biochemistry of leaf versus root litters. Synthesis . These results suggest that leaf and root litters are highly complementary in the way they contribute to soil C stabilization and N availability. As such, global changes that influence the production and turnover of above and below‐ground litter inputs will likely have cascading effects on the balance between these functions. Our results also reveal substantial variation around the trade‐off between soil C stabilization and N availability, suggesting a continuum from ‘underachieving species’ to ‘versatile species’ contributing more to both functions. This opens perspectives for selecting versatile species capable of influencing positively several agro‐ecosystem functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.113
Threshold uncertainty score0.155

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of EcologySame topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsFrench-language works237,207