MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416423574 · doi:10.4103/jimr.jimr_59_25

Reframing preeclampsia via the cyclic GMP–AMP synthase–stimulator of interferon genes–glycocalyx Axis: A systematic review and trial-ready translational model

2025· article· en· W4416423574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wiku Andonotopo, Muhammad Adrianes Bachnas, Wisnu Prabowo, Julian Dewantiningrum, Mochammad Besari Adi Pramono, Khanisyah Erza Gumilar, Muhammad Ilham Aldika Akbar, Ernawati Darmawan, I Nyoman Hariyasa Sanjaya, Anak Agung Gede Putra Wiradnyana, Dudy Aldiansyah, Aloysius Suryawan, Ridwan Abdullah Putra, Waskita Ekamaheswara Kasumba Andanaputra, Laksmana Adi Krista Nugraha, Milan Stanojević

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Integrative Medicine and Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterferonSystematic reviewInnate immune systemTranslational researchCognitive reframingAngiogenesisAnimal modelImmune systemHuman studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Preeclampsia (PE) remains a leading cause of maternal–fetal morbidity, yet its molecular basis and validated biomarkers remain uncertain. This review proposes a mechanistic synthesis linking innate immune sensing through the cyclic GMP–AMP synthase–stimulator of interferon genes (cGAS–STING) pathway with endothelial glycocalyx (eGCX) integrity, reframing PE as an immune–vascular interface disorder. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library through June 2025 was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020. Studies exploring molecular or structural interactions among placental cell-free DNA or mitochondrial DNA (cfDNA/mtDNA), cGAS–STING activation, and eGCX degradation in PE or mechanistically relevant endothelial models were included. Thirty-five publications met eligibility criteria, spanning human cohorts, preclinical experiments, and reviews. Quality appraisal using Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, SYstematic Review Center for Laboratory animal Experimentation, and A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 tools indicated predominantly low-to-moderate bias. Across studies, converging evidence suggests that placental cfDNA and mtDNA may activate cGAS–STING– interferon signaling, promoting endothelial inflammation, heparanase upregulation, and syndecan-1 shedding. The resulting eGCX disruption coincides with reduced sphingosine-1-phosphate levels and angiogenic imbalance, features consistent with early endothelial stress. Most mechanistic insights derive from animal and nonpregnancy models; therefore, their direct applicability to human gestation should be interpreted cautiously given the unique immunological environment of pregnancy. Potential translational pathways include sulodexide, pravastatin, and Soluble fms-like Tyrosine Kinase-1 apheresis as clinically supported strategies, whereas STING inhibitors remain experimental proof-of-concept tools. In summary, this synthesis proposes the cGAS–STING–eGCX axis as a conceptual framework rather than an established paradigm, emphasizing testable hypotheses for early prediction and endothelial protection in PE. The model aligns with the World Health Organization 2030 maternal health target, advocating a shift from reactive to anticipatory care through biomarker-guided surveillance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.010
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Integrative Medicine and Research→Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies→French-language works237,207→